Category: contest (Page 1 of 4)

Winners of the 2025 Southern Cross Short Story Competition

Ballarat Writers are delighted to announce the winning entries in this year’s Southern Cross Short Story Competition, selected from a fabulous shortlist by our judge Jenny Valentish:

Winner – The Transaction, by Kit Scriven

Second Prize – We are the First, by Karen Turner

Third Prize – Seventeen, by Calliope Vale

Highly Commended – Safe Enough to Fall Apart, by Erica Duffield

Highly Commended – Deliverance, by Jodie Kewley

Highly Commended – The Scream, by David McMillan

“I can’t convey enough how hard this was to choose” says Jenny. “The quality was so high. But I loved Kit Scriven’s tale of survival – a kind of goldfields gothic. Some killer lines in here, ‘The grog is sour, not worth the price, but the cloudy brew provides an alibi for the churn in his guts’ being just one, and the whole piece has such a unique tone and rhythm.”

Kit Scriven is a short story writer from central Victoria. He studied creative writing at Bendigo TAFE and the University of Melbourne. His stories and unpublished novella focus on the complexity and wonder of rural life.

Read Kit’s winning short story in full below!

And one more thing – We had several new writers in our shortlist this year, so please don’t be shy, entering competitions is one of the best things that you can do as an emerging writer. Good luck with your writing, and a huge thank you to everyone who entered this year’s competition!

The Transaction

by Kit Scriven

The buyer puts down coin and asks for another jar. The grog is sour, not worth the price, but the cloudy brew provides an alibi for the churn in his guts. He tells himself that beginning will be the hardest. Once he’s committed, he won’t waver. And back home someone’s waiting. Yesterday, they’d persuaded themselves that there are some beginnings where everyone benefits.

He tells himself that King will honour their transaction. Because the shanty is doomed. The diggings are played out. A new strike festers on the southern side of the range. King’s customers are ants to another honey; they will never return.

Go there, the buyer almost tells Missus King. A new beginning. Open a butcher’s shop at the new strike. You could be a seller of linen, or a provider of shovels and pans.

‘Not this,’ he says.

‘What, then?’ says Missus King.

She has a language she’s invented or learned. He interprets the tilt of her head, the jut of her hip.

‘Not that,’ he says.

*

The shanty smells of sweat, home-made grog, vomit. And dog, and children. Based on her size, he estimates the girl is around eleven or twelve. Her arms and legs are sticks. Her feet are bare and rest on the mange on the flank of an extreme-jawed dog.

The girl sits in front of the empty fireplace and warms herself on memory and cur. Her voice is shrill, with most sentences constructed around a curse. Her siblings—twin boys, according to King—jostle on scraps of stained blanket. They try to repeat the last phrase of everything their sister says.

His vision shifts when he lifts the jar to his lips. Missus King is watching him. She has been watching him watching the girl. He translates her nod.

‘No,’ he says. ‘Not that.’

*

There’s not much to look at apart from Missus King, her children, the dog, the slab walls, the fireplace, the floor of stamped-down dirt. Five slices from the trunk of a sawn-down tree offer something to sit on. A shovel stands blade-up in a corner.

The buyer notes Missus King’s interest in the bag he carries with him. He turns his attention to the twins. One of the boys is smaller, and dirtier.

‘No,’ says Missus King.

*

‘McCarthy,’ he says, when Missus King asks.

Three hours he’s waited for King. McCarthy is the first name that enters his head. McCarthy, McCarthy, McCarthy, he says to himself. He rubs his forehead and wonders at its smoothness, which makes him wonder if the skin of the little boys is as smooth as their skin should be. He wonders if his skin is thick enough and whether Missus King can see through him and whether she might suddenly gather up the girl and the twins and make a run for the new diggings.

To distract her he says, ‘Heck of a dog.’

Since he’s arrived the dog has been sprawled under the feet of the girl.

‘Bloody killer,’ the girl says. ‘McCarthy.’

The girl’s feet rest on sparse fur. Mange has eroded most of the covering on the neck and thighs of the dog. The buyer wants to tell the girl that she shouldn’t warm her feet on a dog with skin disease. The need to instruct rises in him. He swallows it down and says, ‘Name?’

‘Beast.’ The girl aims the word at the empty fireplace.

His jar is empty. He bounces it on his knee, one, two, three.

The girl stretches the moment. ‘And the bastard dog is called Molly.’

The laughter of Missus King and her daughter sets the twins off. They giggle in a way that convinces the buyer they might still be real. The boys imitate the words uttered by their sister, ‘bastard-og-alled-olly.’

Which starts Missus King off again. But not the daughter. She’s watching him watching the twins.

He smiles like he appreciates the joke. The words that came out of the mouth of the smaller, dirtier twin were almost precise.

Yes. The little one.

*

The dog growls but doesn’t stir itself.

‘King,’ the girl says.

Instantly, the play and giggle of the twins stops. Missus King swabs a rag over the lump of wood that serves as a counter. The buyer gazes into his empty jar. Then he places it on the dirt and lifts his bag onto his knees. He unbuckles three straps and lifts a flap.

The dog growls again. The buyer notes the tightened strings in the girl’s calves and ankles. She presses her feet against the dog, like she’s trying to squeeze out any chance of further noise.

King enters with a dragged-foot, brittle gait.

Confirmation should not be required, but the buyer can’t help himself. ‘Right?’

King bends his head forward then back. The buyer extracts a small wad of notes from the bag and hands it over. King’s fingers click as he counts.

‘Pick,’ he says.

The buyer opens out his bag and lays it on the floor. A whisky bottle plugged with a cork sits on the wool-lined bottom of the bag. He pushes the bottle to one end.

‘Water. For the journey.’

‘No.’ The girl screams the word into the fireplace.

‘I want the littler one.’ He stops himself from explaining how sometimes everyone can benefit from a new beginning. He decides it’ll be easier if he doesn’t look. He hears King’s foot drag on the dirt, the girl’s sobs.

King’s hands are blotches of grey and pink, the colour of the bare patches on the skin of the dog. The child’s skin is dirt and white. The boy stretches as King settles him against the floor of the bag.

A calloused hand grasps at the canvas flap of the bag. The buyer can’t lift his head. The boy in the bag is beautiful. He stinks, but of himself.

‘Not our Joe.’ Missus King tugs at the bag.

Joseph. All right. Is this a crime, Joseph? Is it a crime to begin?

The boy’s lips rehearse a word, but no sound comes out. The buyer lowers his head.

‘Bastard,’ Joe says.

*

King’s laughter breaks the struggle. The buyer pulls the bag from Missus King’s grip. He remains seated, holding the bag on his knees. The boy is his.

In front of him, Missus King, the girl, and the dog sort themselves into a semi-circle facing King. His laughter is a form of palsy. He shakes and clicks until he gathers control.

‘Jeez,’ he says. He wipes at his eyes. ‘Bastard.’

‘We can’t,’ the girl says.

‘We?’

Missus King steps forward. She leans her face into King’s. ‘The money,’ she says. ‘Give it back.’

The buyer is certain King will resolve the matter. But he doesn’t want to watch. He studies his purchase. He sees himself driving the cart up to the house in the chill of evening, the muting light of dusk settling behind the oak-lined driveway, the welcome, the warmth, the glory.

Three sounds disturb his reverie. A fist striking flesh, followed by a thud and then another. Blood splats against the canvas flap of the bag. A fleck stains the upper lip of the boy. The buyer licks his thumb and rubs the red from the boy’s face and then wipes his thumb against the canvas. When he looks up, Missus King is a twist of legs and arms and torso. Blood seeps from a wound at the base of her skull. Her head has made no impression on the slab of ironbark that masquerades as a bar.

She’s dead, he decides. Or too smart to move.

‘We?’ King says again.

The girl extends her hand, palm upwards. ‘The money. Give the bloody money back. Else.’

‘Else?’ King grabs at her outstretched hand. He twists until she falls to her knees.

‘Beast,’ the girl screams. ‘Beast.’

*

The buyer holds his hands over his ears. He gazes into the face of the boy in the bag, who seems oblivious to his sister’s noise, her command of the curse—and the dog. Perhaps King thought he owned the dog, like he owned the shanty, Missus King, and the children.

Small, cold hands grasp the buyer’s wrists and pull his palms away from his ears.

‘Gunna help me?’ Her breath stinks of shanty.

‘Yes,’ he says.

The girl takes the bag from his knees and carries it to the fireplace. She lifts out the whisky bottle and then lifts the other twin and places him head to toe against Joe.

Joseph, not Joe, the buyer reminds himself. He’s mine.

‘Handy, that bag,’ she says. ‘Warm.’

‘We’ve got a fireplace in every room. And people to light them and keep them going. Joseph will never be cold again.’

‘Joseph?’

‘He’ll have his own bed, with sheets and pillowslips.’

‘Joseph?’

In the centre of the shanty, the dog laps at King’s neck. The bottom half of the man’s beard is red, and wet.

‘He’ll wear shoes.’

‘Our Joe? Shoes?’

Yes. Your Joe. My Joseph. Why didn’t he mention the shoes first up? ‘He’ll go to school. Then university.’

‘Beast.’

The dog lifts its head, and snarls. The girl pats the beaten-down earth in front of the bag. The dog moves into position, its balding haunches facing the fireplace, its sharp end aimed at the buyer.

‘Shovel,’ the girl says. ‘In the corner. Near the window.’

The only window faces west. It’s a hole in the wall. The sun is low, and slants over the body of King. Golden light bathes the dog and almost reaches the boys in the bag. The shovel rests in the north-west corner of the shanty, blade upwards.

The buyer steps around King. The dog adjusts its position.

‘Dig,’ the girl says.

The buyer slaps the blade into the earth.

‘Not there. That’s taken.’ She points at King. ‘There. Next to him. Big enough for two.’

‘Your mother. I think she’s alive.’ He is sure he can see a pulse in the rope of Missus King’s neck. ‘Should I check?’

When the girl doesn’t answer he looks across. She stands with one hand on the head of the dog. Her other hand is palm out; two fingers upthrust.

The buyer decides he shouldn’t look at her. Concentrate on the job. Get it over. King is one. Then Missus King, or him. As he digs, he assesses angles and distance and the weight of the shovel, the speed of the dog.

‘Bobby,’ the girl says.

If he misses, the dog will have him. ‘Pardon.’

‘Bobby. My first. You were gunna dig him up.’

*

The willingness of the earth to accept the shovel surprises the buyer. If he survives, he’ll buy himself a shovel and exercise it daily. And before he dies—if he survives this day—he’ll arrange to go into the ground in the crisp of morning and in a place where the people who put him down can smell dew on eucalyptus, and not the stink of shanty.

‘The twins?’ he says.

‘Mine.’

She steps away from the dog and swings a kick at the corpse of King. The sound of her foot hitting flesh isn’t what the buyer expects.

The dog, interested, sneaks forward a few steps and sniffs at King. Close enough, the buyer tells himself. He flexes his hands, like he’s shaking dirt from the end of the shovel. The dog lifts its head then retreats far enough to be out of reach, but close enough to launch.

‘Hah,’ the girl says. She takes another kick at King. ‘Their grandfather. Their father. I think.’

*

The girl wraps rags around her feet and pushes them into King’s boots. Then she shoves the money the buyer gave her father into the gap between leather and the inside of her right ankle.

She watches while he rolls King into the grave. She speaks to the dog while the buyer drags Missus King into the hole. The woman is heavier and warmer than King.

Once he’s filled the grave with bodies and dirt, the girl takes the shovel from his hands and bangs it, flat-bladed over the lumps in the floor. While she’s busy, the buyer watches the dog. The dog watches him.

The girl throws the shovel down. She drapes the dress she has stripped from her mother over the sleeping boys. She picks up the tatter of blanket on which her sons had lolled. She rubs her hands against the fabric then drops it to the dirt.

‘Outside,’ she says.

*

The girl stands near enough to gain heat from the burning shanty. The buyer sits in the dray, reins in hand. On the floor beside him the boys sleep in the bag. Behind him, the moist snout of the dog sniffs at his neck.

In front of him, firelight sheens the rump and flanks of the mare. Eager to get home, she turns her head and looks at him.

‘Not yet,’ he says.

He drives with the girl in the seat beside him and the dog’s breath in his ear.

‘Your house is warm?’

‘Yes. There’ll be a fire in every bedroom. And the library.’

He infers sky above the trees that line the track. No moon or stars assist, but he can sense something less dark.

‘I’ve seen sheets. In a shop in Maldon.’

‘Two linen cupboards. Filled with sheets and pillowslips. And blankets. We wash our blankets.’

He feels the seat move as she shifts away from him.

But we do wash our blankets. That’s what he wants to say. But doesn’t. The snout of the dog is wet against the back of his neck.

The horse walks. The girl chooses their way through several forks in the track, then a constellation of intersections.

‘Old digging’s,’ she says. ‘Finished.’

He wonders if her name is Molly. Too late to ask. She will always be the girl. Before they’d set off, he’d given her his fob watch and the rest of his money.

‘A new beginning,’ he’d told her.

He could ask her the time, get her talking. Keep her occupied and not re-thinking their transaction. Shoes, that’s what he’ll tell her. They’ll wear shoes.

By his reckoning it’s midnight, or just after. If he asks, will she be able to read the face of his watch in this light? Even if the light is adequate, does she know how to interpret the time?

‘Christ,’ he says. But we do wash our blankets.

*

When they arrive, he is certain she’s given him the directions to Hell. Tents pustule on both sides of the track, which has mutated to thick mud. The mare strains her way through. Flickers of light and flame from kerosene lamps and campfires illuminate what might be men as they stagger between the tents and across the track.

‘Kelly’s here,’ the girl says. ‘His grog sends them crazy.’

Hands reach out of the darkness and grab at her. The dog snaps and tears at them.

‘Stop,’ the girl says.

‘Here?’

He pulls on the reins. The mare gives a heavy sigh. The buyer notes the quiver in his fingers and the way the leather ribbons dance on the animal’s back.

The girl waits until backlit, flickering demons surround the dray. She reaches across and takes the reins from his palsying hands.

‘Get out, McCarthy,’ she says. ‘Else.’

The winner of the 2025 Pamela Miller Flash fiction prize is…

David McMillan with his story, Alas and Alack. Congratulations David!

Second place went to Wendie Daniels for With What Remains, and third place to Barry Kay for The Last Act.

There were 23 entries this year, on the theme of THE LAST ACT. The judges were BWI members Liam Monaghan, Cassandra Arnold, AJ Lyndon and Bruna Pomella.

Now, for your delight, here is the winning story in full:

Alas and Alack

“At last, a last act. An actual act, a finale, a finish, a final fucking finish. That’s it for me Smith. Alas, as they say, alas and alack…”

Dobson was delirious. Raving. Spittle drooled from his slack mouth.

His jaundiced face gaunt, cheekbones protruding like volcanic hills over deep valleys, pale blue irises desert billabongs ringed with dirty yellow clay.

I sat at the bedside holding his skeletal hand, muttering blandishments.

“It’s okay. I’m here. It’ll be alright. The doctor will be here soon.” 

I glanced toward the doorway, to the hospital corridor that glowed like a luminescent portal to the bright business of life, contrasting as it did with the darkened palliative care room. They called it a comfort room, comfort care. Euphemisms abounded in this place. It was furnished like a chapel, or maybe a funeral home, wood panelled walls, soft carpet, bland prints on the walls, and yet a hospital bed.

He, Dobson, would hate it, would have railed against the ersatz religious surroundings, the attempt to deny ‘the last act, the final fucking finish’ as he had ranted.

“It’s that bastard, over there.”

He squirmed in the hospital bed and tried to point toward the corner of the room where I’d hung my coat, his arms twisting, IV tubes snagging.

“Get him out of here. That bastard. Smith? Get him out of here. Smith?”

He turned to face me, untrimmed fingernails digging into the callused skin of my fist.

“I’m here mate. Don’t worry. He’s not there. It’s just you and me comrade.”
“Comrade. Yeah that’s right. We fought the good fight didn’t we.”

“We did. Didn’t we?”

“Sure, we did Dobbo.”

“Where are we Smith? Why’s it so dark? Like a bloody confessional. You sure he’s not here?”

“Who?”

“That bastard in the black cassock. You remember him don’t you. Just a minute ago in the corner. Over there.” His finger shook as he pointed to the shadows, knuckles like swollen wasp galls.

I took a teaspoon of the ice chips the nurse – the older one, not the pretty one – had brought with an expression that said, ‘I’m being kind here, you can see that, but there’s no hope’. A grim twist of the lips.

Dobbo’s lips were dry and cracked, his tongue the colour and texture of mould on cheese. He lapped at the ice greedily, bright eyes beseeching.

“You remember don’t you? The confessional. The sacristy?”

“Nah mate, that was you. You’re the ‘mick’ not me.”

“You don’t remember? The belfry?  Come up for a smoke, he said.”

“More…” I spooned ice.

Dobson swallowed and stared at me intently.

“He touched. I pushed. Surplice flapping. Gold and white. Thought he might fly like a bird. More like a stone in the end.”

“Shit, mate.”

“Yeah. Flapping in the wind like those coloured ribbons on a church fence. It’s all shit. Help me mate. I’m scared.”

Dobson closed his eyes and sighed.  His grip relaxed. His breathing stopped.

* * *

Congratulations to everyone who entered and especially to the winner once again!

Pamela Miller Annual Flash Fiction Prize 2025

Ballarat Writers are delighted to announce that, once again, the Pamela Miller Prize will be taking place this year:

What is the Pamela Miller Prize? It’s an annual Flash Fiction competition launched in 2015 in memory of the late Pamela Miller, who was a prolific supporter (and winner!) of the flash fiction contest as well as of BWI in general. It’s for BWI members only.

What do I have to do to enter? Send in a short story of maximum 500 words plus title (there is no minimum) on the theme of THE LAST ACT. You can choose any title you like as long as it fits the theme, or you can just use the theme title.

When must I submit? Submissions will be open between 1st and 30th June this year. The deadline for submissions will be midnight (Melbourne Time) on 30th June.

How should I submit? Send in your piece of Flash Fiction to Roland Renyi, this year’s competition co-ordinator, at roland@opencitylimited.com

Are there any rules for submitting? Yes, leave your name off the submitted story when you email it to Roland. Your name should be on the covering email only. Send it in Word or pdf in a 12 point font, single or double spaced as you wish. Oh yes, and don’t write more than 500 words (I already said that). Entries of more than 500 words or with the author’s name in the main document will not be accepted.

Why should I enter? That’s an easy one! The winning entry will receive a prize of $100 and the runner-up will get an honourable mention!

When will the winning entries be announced? At our Ballarat Writers’ get together on 30th July. If you cannot attend, the winner and runner up will be announced on our web site and contacted. The winning entry will be published in our newsletter and on our web site.

In other words, it’s a no-brainer (not the stories, of course). 500 words can easily be written in a day and Flash Fiction is all about quality, not quantity – it’s the love that you put into it that will make it special!

For any enquiries, contact Roland at roland@opencitylimited.com

The contest is now closed. Read the winning entry here: https://ballaratwriters.com/blog/the-winner-of-the-2025-pamela-miller-flash-fiction-prize-is/

TIME TO GET CREATIVE – THE 2025 PAMELA MILLER PRIZE IS COMING

Ballarat Writers are delighted to announce that, once again, the Pamela Miller Prize will be taking place this year:

What is the Pamela Miller Prize? It’s an annual Flash Fiction competition launched in 2015 in memory of the late Pamela Miller, who was a prolific supporter (and winner!) of the flash fiction contest as well as of BWI in general. It’s for BWI members only.

What do I have to do to enter? Send in a short story of maximum 500 words plus title (there is no minimum) on the theme of THE LAST ACT. You can choose any title you like as long as it fits the theme, or you can just use the theme title.

When must I submit?  Submissions will be open between 1st and 30th June this year. The deadline for submissions will be midnight (Melbourne Time) on 30th June.

How should I submit? Send in your piece of Flash Fiction to Roland Renyi, this year’s competition co-ordinator, at roland@opencitylimited.com

Are there any rules for submitting? Yes, leave your name off the submitted story when you email it to Roland. Your name should be on the covering email only.  Send it in Word or pdf in a 12 point font, single or double spaced as you wish. Oh yes, and don’t write more than 500 words (I already said that). Entries of more than 500 words or with the author’s name in the main document will not be accepted.

Why should I enter? That’s an easy one! The winning entry will receive a prize of $100 and the runner-up will get an honourable mention!

When will the winning entries be announced? At our Ballarat Writers’ get together on 30th July. If you cannot attend, the winner and runner up will be announced on our web site and contacted. The winning entry will be published in our newsletter and on our web site.

In other words, it’s a no-brainer (not the stories, of course). 500 words can easily be written in a day and Flash Fiction is all about quality, not quantity –  it’s the love that you put into it that will make it special!

For any enquiries, contact Roland at roland@opencitylimited.com

Winners of the 2024 Martha Richardson Memorial Poetry prize

We are delighted to announce that the winners of this year’s contest with the theme of The Bush are:

1st prize Cassandra Arnold, To Map a Myth

2nd prize Roxeena Bidgood, Bush Pastoral

3rd Richenda Rudman, The Pioneer

Our judge, Melissa Watts made these comments in general:

It has been a pleasure to read the entries for the 2024 Martha Richardson Memorial Poetry Prize. In Australia, The Bush is a slippery, amorphous term and I was eager to see how each poet would respond to the topic. The competition provided varied responses from references to actual shrubs to ‘the bush’ as a physical location, a theoretical way of life, people who live in regional areas, concerns and issues of regional life. There were also politically-styled poems on climate change and tree clearing. The competition was stylistically varied including sonnets, elegies, couplets, ekphrastic, pastoral and free-verse poems. This wide scope, both stylistically and thematically demonstrated a high quality of work. Thank you to all who entered for the time and dedication put towards your work.

Here are the winning entries in full, with her specific comments after each one.

FIRST PLACE

To Map a Myth, by Cassandra Arnold

The Bush is a myth. 
(A whitefella-invader-colonialist-construct.)

Not quite
as distant as

the outback

but still hauntingly coloured outside the lines
for our office drones and Uber drudges.

A vast cultural backyard copper,
it will boil up your longings and dreams,
send them back to you in a scented stream to condense
in no-salt-tears on the bleak/bleached fabric of your days.


To the settlers/squatters
it was untouched (unearned) wealth: terra nullius
where man-the-hunter-and-tamer could wield the axe of progress,
cut away invisible histories, sow a crop of copied names:

Gloucester Newcastle Stroud Brighton
Adelaide Augusta Bacchus Marsh Melbourne


Clinging to lost safeties/customs, scared/scarred strangers
stamped old impressions on (their) new-claimed land.

The Bush. Like Easter and Christmas,
the phrase comes laden with glamour and baubles.
Host of picnics, summer camps, barbeques,
it is rendered both small and huge in your block-sized life.


Old charts show

nothingness


undifferentiated space

a place to get lost in

to die in

to blame


The inhabitants knew differently.
Know its seasons, harvests, shelters, risks.
Know its stories and promises.
(Already grieve its stolen future.)

The Bush.
Mutter it with me one last time, lips curved in an ironic smile.
Myths are not always maps after all.

Comments from Melissa:

The Bush is a myth. Full Stop.

From the first line of this poem, we are challenged. This first-person perspective is not a gentle invitation to a debate but rather a statement with no way out. This does not mean, however, that the poem is combative. The line spacing feeds beautifully back into the cartographic title, creating a pace in which to reflect, to luxuriate within the poetic form to allow the reader to think and consider. Unlike our ‘block-sized’, lives this poem creates a sense of scale with The Bush as a place of erased histories and copied histories. Asa place of ‘picnics, summer camps and barbeques’ but also a ‘place to get lost in/to die in/ to blame.’

The poem makes strong use of poetic devices. There is a beautiful use of assonance and strong imagery, in particular in the italicized stanzas. Certain phraseology made me stop and re-read. I particularly like ‘hauntingly coloured outside the lines’, ‘sow a crop of copied names’, and the idea of a block-sized life.’ I also admire the accomplished use of punctuation, particularly hyphens, slashes and brackets to further arguments and images.

Finally, the last line made me wonder – had I been led down the garden path? Did I fully understand the argument? This poem had me thinking long after I read it, which is a sign of a proficient poet with a masterful poem.”


SECOND PLACE
Bush Pastoral, by Roxeena Bidgood

Fading into landscapes 
of repetitive days.
Oh! remember to look outside
the habitual eyeline.
It takes a glance, just one to the side
and focus exhales to expand into
vistas beyond the linear.

And you are there, forming
from paddock’s limb
long and slender in curve of hip
and thigh of broken and unbroken
swathes of green and husk-dry grassland.
While branches bend and sway
with leaf-shed tears that fall on earth-skin
dry and curl in organic layers
to become food for trees.
Where memory threads
are strung out on morning dew-clad
strands of spider web.

Nod and bounce tiptoe tightrope walker
of yellow puffs against green
and silver light beyond gold.
That dull illusive shine
caught in transit between trunk
and trunk. One slight dip in the skin
below shoulder blade and the nape
of an elegant neck curving up to
cascades of gold woven with branches
dominating negative spaces
filled with light.

And you are there, a slanting light
to fetch silence slow as indrawn breath
and cry out in windblown heights
of sky-clad ceilings brushed by
scattered fringing and spirit-fingered
reaching of unclad branches.
With fingers gnarled by wisdom
reaching, to tap a shoulder
to tap and capture
vistas beyond the linear.

Comments from Melissa:

“This poem prompts its readers to look beyond our ‘habitual eyelines’ and ‘expand into vistas beyond the linear’ to avoid fading ‘into landscapes of repetitive days’. And what a prompt it is. The poem continues to deliver to the reader the type of beauty and peace that can be found when we look towards the bush. Full of imagery, I can see the bushland forming from a wide view at the ‘paddock’s limb’ to the minute view of ‘dew-clad strands of spider web.’ It’s impossible to rush this poem. The density of imagery makes us travel slowly as we take in colour (where the poet has so beautifully blended colour with light and shine), shape (curves, negative spaces and slanting light), and sound. I felt that the ‘you’ in this poem could have referred to The Bush, a single tree, a spirit or ancestral being, or God. This ambiguity made the poem more interesting and changing as I read and re-read the work.”


THIRD PLACE

The Pioneer, by Richenda Rudman

Inspired by Frederick McCubbin’s painting, The Pioneer (1904)

Wistfully, a woman gazes through bush
at the brindle girths of trees like ogres in her mother’s tales.
And the greens of leavesolive and sage, so dense
she can barely catch the bold sky winking,
as if to say, these trees are for taming.

Cleverness, she thinks, watching creatures scratch the earth;
they are subjects of their sovereign tree,
whose roots and shade commune to feed
and grow all in their dominion.

She is remembering the darkness she’s walked before 
the broken promises of emerald farms, their yield
nought but the shredded people in shredded clothes,
scratching the earth for seeds, for moss.

Toil on toil, the bush is cleared
for the sun’s sceptre to bless a garden,
for its body parts to make a house,
for a child to be born.

Tree by tree, the bush is sacrificed
for harvests of crops and clusters of buildings.

A man crouches before a rough wooden cross;
it marks the place
that beds the body, which rests and rots and feeds the bush

To grow and be cut down again,
in this duopoly of life and death.

Comments from Melissa:

“As I read the title of this poem I was aware that the poem referred to the famous triptych of the same name. However, I decided to use my first reading of the poem detached from my (foggy) memory of the artwork to consider if the poem worked on its own. I believe that it did that. This poem provides a third-person perspective of a woman in the bush and her personal history, traumatic and dark. Juxtaposed with the unnamed woman’s narrative is the personification of the natural world, bright and colourful – the ‘bold sky winking/as if to say, these trees are for taming’ the ‘sovereign tree’, ‘the sun’s sceptre to bless a garden’ and the bush’s ‘body parts to make a house’. The second part of the poem introduces a man crouching before a grave. Again the juxtaposition of human and bush builds to the poem’s final couplet, reminding us that like the bush we will ‘grow and be cut down again/in this duopoly of life and death.’ As a final note I’d like to add that upon reading the poem with the artwork (which is, of course, the purpose of ekphrastic poetry) I felt that the two artworks complemented each other, with the poem encouraging the reader to consider the unseen within the painting.”


Congratulations again to the winners, and to all of you who submited such quality work.

The winner of the 2024 Pamela Miller Flash Fiction prize is…

Richenda Rudman with her entry, The Seventh Son. Congratulations, Richenda!

The award was announced at the Members’ Night on 31st July.

Sixteen entries were received for the members-only contest on the theme this year of FIRE. The judges were members of the Ballarat Writers committee: Darren Rout, Phil Green, Cassandra Arnold and Bev Foster.

Now, for your delight, here is her winning story:

The Seventh Son

by Richenda Rudman

Children burned when he had a day off.

Chief Blayney realised this an hour into correlating rosters with fires and casualties; it was like condensation being wiped off a window. When Roy Allstock was working, children were saved from fires.

Allstock, always last man out, jogged from buildings sheathed in flames, carrying children, seconds before the buildings collapsed and embers shot like crazed stars into the smoke-dark sky.

‘How the hell did he get them out?’ Blayney asked his deputy as they walked across blackened ground, where an iron bed frame was twisted into a chaotic ringlet. The deputy shrugged. ‘They should be dead.’

* * *

Roy Allstock was an experienced firefighter when he joined Blayney’s platoon in Cranston; he worked hard, said little, was neither tall or short, plain or handsome.

One afternoon in the dayroom, between a card game and newspapers, the conversation turned to families. Allstock said he was the second youngest of eight kids, the last boy before the only girl in the family.

‘Your mother must have been pleased.’ Blayney said.

‘Yeh, she was. Strange, my father was the seventh son, too.

‘Funny how these things run in families.’

Before a seed from memory germinated in Blayney’s head, the discussion ended when they were called out to a fire.

According to the plump wheezing woman living next door, a woman and two little boys lived in the house. ‘The mother’s a drinker. Neglects the kids. I reckon she’s nodded off and dropped her ciggy!’

Another firefighter and Allstock entered the blazing building, while the rest of the crew attacked the fire from outside.  

The woman, coughing, emerged in the clutch of Allstock’s partner, but the height of the flames was fast becoming uncontrollable and Blayney’s gut sank as he looked at the fiery wall. Then he saw it: Allstock appeared, carrying a child on each hip as easily as if they were small clouds. Blayney looked as closely as the smoke and heat would allow, at how the fire was set apart from Allstock and the children, as if a thick and cooling membrane surrounded them. And despite the chaos, Allstock appeared to be calmly talking.

Blayney had to pull the wheezy neighbour off the dazed mother and didn’t recall Allstock’s actions until a final piece in the mosaic of Allstock’s abilities was provided by a child’s drawing.

The newly sober woman and two little boys visited the fire station, where the older child had drawn a picture of a firefighter carrying them out of the fire.

‘Looks like Allstock,’ one of the men said.

Allstock ruffled the boy’s hair. ‘That’s a great drawing!’

‘Yes,’ said the boy. ‘It’s you telling the fire to stay away from us.’

Everyone laughed, except Allstock, who gave a small smile.

And then the seed in Blayney’s head sprouted. The old tale was true: the seventh son of a seventh son talks to fire. And the fire listens.

* * *

It’s that time of year again!

The Martha Richardson Memorial Poetry Prize 2024

Our biennial poetry competion will be open for entries from August 1 to October 13.

You can find all the details by clicking the link below.

The judge, Melissa Watts, is also offering a poetry workshop, POLISH TO PUBLISH on Sunday 22 September. Details to follow!

Here’s what she says about the day:

Roll up your sleeves – this interactive workshop is designed to make your poem gleam.

Bring along some drafts and work through a range of guided activities that will have you appreciating your work in new and expansive ways. Be prepared to be challenged, you may need to kill your darlings, but the result will have you glistening in the slush pile.

Note: This class is designed to work with your existing drafts so please remember to bring them along.

So get thinking about the 2024 theme, The Bush, and we look forward to seeing all the entries come flooding in! First prize is $1000…

It’s that time of the year again with the Pamela Miller Prize, our annual flash fiction competition.

The winner of the Pamela Miller Prize 2024 will receive a certificate and $100 first prize, as well as publication in the Ballarat Writers newsletter and website. The winner will be announced at the Ballarat Writers July members’ night. 

The Pamela Miller Prize first ran in 2015, in memory of Pamela Miller, who was a very active and productive member of Ballarat Writers. She was a writer of short stories and poetry, and won the short story competition with ‘Murder at MADE’ in 2014. Early in 2015, Pamela wrote a very popular poem called ‘Bronze Heads—The Prime Minister’s Walk’ as part of a Ballarat Writers project during the Begonia Festival.

Entries open: Saturday June 1

Entries close: Sunday June 30

Ballarat Writers is accepting fictional prose entries of up to 500 words on the theme Fire.

Entry is free. 

This is limited to members of Ballarat Writers, so make sure you’ve joined or renewed your membership!

All entries must:

  • be original and unpublished
  • be written by a current member of Ballarat Writers (judging committee members cannot enter)
  • engage with the theme Fire, and be 500 words in length or less (not including the title)
  • be sent to competitions@ballaratwriters.com with the subject line ‘2024 Pamela Miller Prize Entry’.

As the competition will be a blind judging, please do not include your name or contact details on the entry. 

You can read more about the Pamela Miller prize here.

Good luck and happy writing!

The results of the Southern Cross Short Story Competition 2023

The winning entries of the 2023 Southern Cross Short Story Competition were announced at the Ballarat Writers members’ night on 29 November.

The successful entries were selected by judge Graeme Simsion from a long-list as selected by the reading committee from a pool of 95 entries. Graeme’s comments about the winners and entries are available to read here, and the winning entry here.

Congratulations to the winners, and all those who made the shortlist!

Winner ($1000): Maxwell Han: A Boy in a Raincoat and a Boy in a Bus Stop

First runner-up ($400): Janeen Samuel: Branch Lines

Second runner-up ($100): Nakita Kitson: Digging

Highly commendeds: “Over Your Souls” by Rebecca Higgie and “Summer’s Desire” by Shelley Dark.

Southern Cross Short Story Competition 2023 – Judge’s Report

Graeme Simsion

Thank you for the opportunity to read the twenty-one shortlisted entries in the above competition and for entrusting me with the responsibility of judging them.

First, by the standards of competitions I’ve been involved in before, this was a strong collection. While the intents and styles differed, the writing was consistently assured, and, I sensed, had benefited from careful revision and editing. Any criticisms should be taken in that context.

Selecting the winner, place-getters and highly-commended entries was difficult, and necessarily subjective. I suspect that if there had been multiple judges, we would have found it easy to agree on the ten best stories, but would have had plenty of debate as to the order in which to place them.

On first read, I rated the stories on each of four criteria: quality of prose, story, originality and engagement – incorporating other factors such as character and sense of place under those headings.

I did not consider fidelity to the theme tracks of desire. I assumed the pre-readers would have confirmed that hurdle had been cleared, but generally it seemed to have been addressed – sometimes fundamentally, sometimes cleverly, sometimes as a box-check!

I returned to the stories some time later and flagged those which had stayed with me –  another criterion to consider. I ended up with a short-short list of seven stories, which I re-read and reflected on before making final choices.

As noted earlier, the prose was consistently of a high standard.

Most stories had a strong sense of place and period, from seventeenth century London to Italy to the street where I live. The descriptions of physical environment featured some of the best writing, and were overall stronger than those of character. Emotions were vivid on the page; motivation sometimes less clear.

The best stories had a good balance of ‘show’ and ‘tell’, some of the less successful ones could have used more dialogue and action. No surprise there for writing teachers!

It was in the domain of story that writers took advantage of the convention that short stories need not follow the beginning-middle-end structures of popular fiction. But I felt that overall, the storytelling, in the broadest sense of how events and revelations unfolded, was not as developed as the prose: the authors hadn’t always realised the full potential of some promising ideas.

Several of the stories alternated between two situations (one past, one present), an entirely workable structure, but there was often room for clearer causal or thematic links between the two threads.

The old-fashioned twist is still alive though not necessarily well. To work effectively, it needs to change the reader’s understanding of and response to what has gone before in a fundamental way. In several cases, the ‘reveal’ was of something less central with correspondingly less impact. Indeed, few of the stories hit me with an emotional punch; their power was steady rather than sudden.

Originality lay largely in the choice of subjects. Prose and structure were consistently familiar rather than experimental or confronting, and there was little that was attention-seeking or distracting.

A couple of stories ventured into non-literal territory, but there were guideposts for readers. The overwhelming majority of the writing would have sat comfortably in a mainstream novel.

Which is also to say that most authors did not take advantage of the short-story format to experiment with styles that the reader might find tiring in a longer work. About half the stories were written in present tense and about half in first-person, and a couple chose omniscient points of view. But not much to scare the horses.

‘Desire’ was predominantly sexual and the sexuality conventionally straight or gay male (which was well represented). Within that, there were a couple of quite distinct voices and unusual settings. Unfortunately, the most original ideas didn’t correspond with the strongest execution.

I included ‘engagement’ as a catch-all for how interested I was, how much I wanted to keep reading and what impact the story might have on me – and, by extension, other readers. Most of these stories were easy and, yes, engaging, to read, and, as noted earlier, the styles would happily lend themselves to full-length novels.

My involvement in the stories was mostly emotional rather than intellectual; I tended to finish with a feeling rather than something to think about. And emotionally, there was definitely more ‘down’ than ‘up’ – not a lot of happy endings! Writers sometimes forget the emotional power of an instance of human kindness or decency in an otherwise grim scenario. And humour, even in the form of a wry observation, was thin on the ground.

When I returned to the stories, there were five that had stayed with me more than the others. It’s perhaps interesting that they were already all in my short-short list.

So:

The Winner: A Boy in a Raincoat and a Boy in a Bus Stop.

The most demanding of the stories, and the most rewarding to read a second time. A finely controlled piece which explores connection and disconnection and alternates deftly between the allegorical and the literal, and between authorial and character points of view. As much about what it evokes as what it says.

Second:  Branch Lines

Assured writing that would be at home in a contemporary novel of family life. The narrator’s desire to know her history is ever-present but elegantly understated. The sharp but not showy observation of place and character lift it above the ordinary.

Third: Digging

The strongest conventional storytelling: two stories linked by the central character. One gives us a powerful description of place and physical jeopardy; the other, memorable characters and emotional conflict.

Highly Commended

Over Your Souls
Summer’s Desire

« Older posts

© 2026 Ballarat Writers

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑